The multi-polar world today is
increasingly characterized by authoritarian states/rulers/dictators, rising
nationalism and religious fundamentalism, growing economic asymmetry, a thousand
mutinies mainly regional, chronic instability like in the Middle East,
Afghanistan, and an increasing confrontationist clash between the democratic
liberal world order and illiberal, non-conformist nations/regimes who want to
follow their own pathways. Nations are compelled to constantly engage in 24X7 internal and external strategic balancing
in a continuous phase of cooperation, competition, confrontation or even
conflict if national aspirations are threatened. This transformation is fed by
internal and external societal/cultural/historical/religious strife. Europe
which was historically built on a shared belief in democracy, individual
freedom, commitment to human rights, gender equality, freedom of speech and
importantly religion, and right to migration/asylum has also been affected by
the changing world.
There was a time when Muslim scientists, astronomers, surgeons and mathematicians were at the cutting edge of their disciplines. Muslims were then seen as representing a powerful, sophisticated and rich world civilization. Islamic mathematicians such as Al-Khwarizmi, Avicenna and Jamshīd al-Kāshī made advances in algebra, trigonometry, geometry and Arabic numerals. Islamic doctors described diseases like smallpox and measles and challenged classical Greek medical theory. Today, ironically, Muslims are seen as destitute refugees escaping mad and autocratic Muslim rulers.[i] In this guise it is understandable that Europeans will not see Islam as a part of European civilization. Therefore, it is necessary that they peep into their own history, when Muslims were very much part of the European culture/history and impacted the Renaissance, Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment. While many people talk of a ‘Judeo-Christian’ Europe, the fact is that it is the Judeo, Christian and Islamic religions, i.e. the Abrahamic faiths that came together, while engaging with Greek philosophy, to create and nourish what we now know as the European civilization. Chancellor Merkel’s welcoming of some million migrants was an act of compassion for which the world, have applauded her. The friction between a Europe that wishes to preserve its historic identity, and newcomers who wish to escape their own countries and move to Europe is real, not a delusion. There is unfortunately an alarming rise in xenophobia in which islamophobia is the pivotal constituent in Europe. At the outset, comprehensive statistical inputs indicate that contrary to presumptions and assumptions which a nationalist/original citizen feels/perceives the immigrants (from past and present wave of migrations in last 5/6 years) have indeed integrated with European nations well.
Xenophobia connotes ‘dislike of or prejudice against people from other countries’ and Islamophobia refers to ‘unreasonable dislike/hatred or fear of, and prejudice against, Muslim or Islam’. Many experts feel that the real danger to European unity and future, is neither economy, history, nationalism, or extreme political affiliations but rising xenophobia in which Islamophobia is the overriding factor. We have become accustomed to the word Islamophobia, but the ‘phobia’ part softens the meaning as if it was a medical condition deserving of tolerance. EU legislation classifies anti-Muslim as racism, which throws up its ominous characteristic starkly. Racism is not a temporary or transitional phenomenon; it is a social pandemic that burrows into the structures of society, infiltrating and disintegrating all areas of life. Another popular term commonly used today is ‘Political Islam’. Political Islam is any interpretation of Islam as a source of political identity and action. It can refer to a wide range of individuals and/or groups who advocate the formation of state and society according to their understanding of Islamic principles. This is not strictly applicable in Europe, at least for the present.
Common factors that trigger xenophobia in general are differences in cultural and social perception and the rejection of any alterations within the social environment and a lack of education. This has got cemented by highly publicized Islamic fundamentalism and dramatic visuals of terrorism globally, which unfortunately has cost many lives. Without pulling punches, another main cause is the Politicians’ effect.[ii]Experts of behavioral sciences and international relations accept that politicians have a clear effect on the people, urging them to participate in xenophobic movements while fueling their ideologies with hateful rhetoric. ‘Politicians affect society. The stronger their words, the more effect they have, as they polarize people’, said Özdemir (Mahinur Özdemir, former member of the Belgian Parliament). Soytekin (Serkan Soytekin, the press secretary of the DENK Party, first political party in the Netherlands established by migrants) endorses it and says, ‘For instance, in Holland I suffer the same problems as my neighbor, but they create an artificial difference between us based on race and religion,”. He adds “Our first aim is to make people recognize the fact that there is xenophobia; then, to find the main causes of this issue and see if there are enough measures against it’.
European History of Migrants Assimilation
Europe has historically been able to cope well with large influxes of refugees. Throughout the Cold War, for example, millions of people moved from Eastern to Western Europe, fleeing communism. Europe then resettled hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese refugees in the 1980s and 90s. It even took large numbers of migrants from Bosnia and Kosovo in the 1990s, including many Muslims, but this was before Islam became politically toxic. There has been far greater political skepticism towards those fleeing conflicts in Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Syria. Concurrently, much of the Muslim world seems to be turning away from the liberal values that have defined Europe since 1945. A visible change can be seen in Turkey, which once was a candidate that wanted to enter the European Union, now an increasingly authoritarian and religiously chauvinist state. Interestingly, Europe of 44/51 (7 transcontinental nations) nations shares responsibility for a smaller number of refugees than is currently in Lebanon alone. Ironically, all European countries without exception desperately need immigrant labour. The elephant in the room[iii] is an underlying Islamophobia. The simple fact is that European member states don’t really want Muslim immigrants. The liberal political elites of western Europe have steered clear of admitting that the biggest single barrier to coherent asylum and immigration policies is public anxiety about Islam. The anti-Muslim bias is omnipresent not only geographically but also across the political spectrum.
Broad and overlapping
categories within Islam/ Muslims are available:
- One source classifies
them under three categories. Literalist
Islam; those Muslims who believe that to be a good Muslim should mean to
adhere to the letter and spirit of Islamic law; the mystics, those who believe in a warm, inclusive embrace of humanity
which reflects the love of the divine for all creation; and finally, the modernists, those who believe in
balancing faith with modernity. Those in this final category believed that
modernity, with its characteristics of democracy and accountability and Islam
were compatible. It is this category that is under threat directly from the
literalists. It is the failure of the modernist category that creates a
backlash and gives space for the emergence of the Taliban, ISIS and so on.
- Another method is to
view them as ‘contextualists’[iv],
who believe that the policies and practices of Islamist movements are driven
less by ideology than by events, and are reactive and adaptive. The groups’
main goal is to survive as coherent organizations and political actors. Their use
of religious rhetoric is often little more than ‘Muslim-speak’. Whereas the ‘the essentialist’ view holds that Islamists are fundamentally
ideological and that any concessions they make to secularist principles or
institutions are purely tactical: their participation in electoral politics
hardly precludes them from calling for violent jihad, as well. In other words,
Islamists see the ballot box as little more than a path to power; once there,
they would replace democracy with theocracy.
- The mistake could be in stereotyping/characterizing
people who come from across the Middle East, North Africa, South Asia, and
Southeast Asia as ‘Muslims’ rather than as immigrants from different
ethnicities or nationalities. Many Muslims actually wish to escape from being
categorized as fundamentalist/ too religious. In each European country the
relationship of the Muslim minority to the host country is different and
depends on the historical relationship with their country of origin and the
circumstances of their arrival. After 9/11, especially in the US and Europe
they were seen simply as Muslims. While earlier in Europe they were known as
Turks, Kurds, Pakistanis and also by their ethnicity and profession, now they
are clubbed in people’s perception. The young generation of Muslim immigrants
born as citizens in the US or Europe feel the full backlash of the prejudice
against Muslims, and it is from here that some young men and women are
susceptible to the preaching and get allured to the more extreme literalists
who argue that there can be no coexistence between Islam and the West.
have emerged across Europe that fundamentally contradict liberal values. A
familiar pattern seen is; a negative incident occurs that implicates refugees
(Muslim), the media pounces, the far right mobilizes, and the center-right
shifts inches closer toward tightening borders. Prejudices difficult to break
is that centrist politics has declined in Europe. Centrist politicians have
seen their vote share collapse.
Security Sit: The security threats that Europe faces are real. The self-proclaimed
Islamic State (also known as ISIS) and other terrorist groups threaten lives
and values. Many of the refugees coming to Europe are themselves fleeing
ISIS-related violence. The way to address security challenges is through better
intelligence and criminal justice, not through restrictions on the right to
asylum. The US and UK have avoided a mainland terrorist attack over the past
decade because of its superior intelligence services and not because of its
immigration policies. Bolstering those services, rather than undermining
liberal values, is the response to terror.
Statistical Inputs: Statistically, there is no greater likelihood that refugees will be
involved in terrorism or crime than the general populations. Have their
numbers created as much havoc as many politicians claim? In fact, although
their integration has been incremental and costly, the refugees have not, as
right-wingers and others have charged, swamped the welfare system, overwhelmed
the schools and public budgets, or deprived native citizens of employment. The
refugees’ cultures and religions (mostly Islam) have not impeded integration or
undermined social cohesion (degree varies from nation to nation with Germany
being best at integration despite accepting maximum immigrants). The 2018, Islamophobia report of
the SETA Foundation shows that there have been hundreds of thousands of
Islamophobia attacks recorded in Europe in that year alone. The greatest number
of incidents occurred in Germany, with 678 attacks on German Muslims, followed
by France and Austria, with 676 and 540, respectively. When attacks on mosques
and various discrimination cases are included, the numbers escalate even more.
The report also shows that compared to the previous year, there has been a
remarkable rise in the number of attacks. In 2019, research conducted for the Bertelsmann
Stiftung’s Religion Monitor confirmed widespread mistrust towards Muslims
across Europe. In Germany and Switzerland, every second respondent said they
perceived Islam as a threat. In the UK, two in five share this perception. In
Spain and France, about 60 per cent are of the opinion that Islam is
incompatible with the ‘West’. In Austria, one in three doesn’t want to have
Muslims in India, Europe can Learn: In India, after the 1857 uprisings that almost toppled British rule in the subcontinent, the British consciously left religion alone. This allowed Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs to maintain their religious identity and even nourish it. However, the British did use religion to sow the seeds of partition for their geo-strategic interests. In India the Indian Muslim community is well integrated into the Indian society. The 195 million Muslim population of India make up 15 per cent of the Indian population, 10.3 per cent of the world, three times the population of France today, yet, only 18 Indian Muslims were found joining ISIS. Compare this with France, which has only 10 million Muslims but has more than 2000 ISIS fighters who are of French nationality. Muslims excel in every field of human activity. The big moment of Indian Muslims came, when, in the wake of the deadliest and most famous Mumbai terror attack in 2008, the Muslim Council decided not to allow the burial of the bodies of the 9 Jihadists killed during the Taj siege. Islam, to Muslims in India, is not at all about killing innocent civilian people. This act drew international headlines.
The starting point must be a clearheaded articulation and reassertion of
liberal values. Özdemir (Mahinur Özdemir, former
member of the Belgian parliament) said that as long as rising
Islamophobia is not accepted by European countries, but clubbed loosely with
xenophobia, a solution was not likely to occur. Despite the overwhelming
increase in Islamophobic attacks, most European countries refuse to include
Islamophobia as a separate category of hate crimes, an essential first step to
uncovering the real scale of this problem, as is the case regarding
anti-Semitism. The good news is that, thanks to the Black Lives
Matter protests, the ground is now fertile in Europe for anti-xenophobic
activism and policies. Soon after the killing of George Floyd in police
custody and the Black Lives Matter campaign that spilled into Europe, it
galvanised continent-wide protests, forcing EU in appointing its first ever
anti-racism coordinator.[v] Concurrently, people who migrate to
Europe must adhere to its laws and social norms. But people should be judged and
punished as individuals. Second, Europe should not waver in its commitment
to freedom of religion. In a liberal community, people must be allowed to
believe what they choose. Third, Europe would have to do a better job upholding
freedom of speech. Finally, Europe must protect the right to asylum.
Challenges and Recommendations
The physical, emotional and psychological
impact and effects on anti-Muslim discrimination include[vi]:
- Fear of attending worship services, entering mosques or wearing distinguishing religious or traditional attire or symbols that negatively affects the rights of individuals and communities to manifest their religion or beliefs.
- A sense of requirement to abstain from identifying publicly as Muslim, expressing their cultural and religious identity or attending religious, cultural or other events, which can exclude them from public life.
- A feeling or necessity to self-censor, which could cause Muslims to be reticent to express empathy or support for countries that have a Muslim majority in order to avoid being stigmatized.
What can European (or any) governments do? They can take a range of
measures to address the problem of intolerance against Muslims. A secular,
multi-dimensional democratic country like India must also pay heed. Governments
- Acknowledge the presence of intolerance and prejudice against Muslims which poses a threat to social cohesion, security and stability and the need for this to be addressed institutionally and systemically.
- Raise awareness of the phenomenon of anti-Muslim hatred, and reinforce values based on the protection of human rights for all.
- Assess risk and prevent attacks by enhancing co-operation between police and intelligence agencies and Muslim communities through formal communication, transparency, joint planning and action, including regular meetings with mosques and Islamic institutions.
- Build trust by developing and institutionalizing working partnerships with Muslim communities, civil society organizations and individuals.
- Improve protection for Muslim communities, institutions and sites, with focus on special/religious holidays, as also days when anti-Muslim protests are on.
- Consider and incorporate expertise within Muslim communities (diverse including women) when conducting threat assessment, security planning and/or development of crisis management systems.
- Recognize and record any anti-Muslim bias motivation when investigating and prosecuting criminal acts or sensitizing police agencies to the specific features of hate crimes against Muslims.
- Reassure Muslim communities of the state’s commitment to protect.
- Provide support to victims and assist communities.
- Support research by academics and civil society groups on the narratives and ideology of hate groups and individuals promoting intolerant rhetoric.
- Ensure that public messaging recognizes hate crime as not only a threat to the dignity and integrity of an individual, but also to entire communities.
Rising Xenophobia of which Islamophobia is the main ingredient is a ground reality in Europe. If unchecked it can pose a grave danger to the unity and stability of Europe and EU. India, a diverse multi-religion/ ethnic/ cultural/ nation is proud of its secular fabric and way of life, and enjoys genuine awe, respect and reputation globally. However, these are challenging times with rising majoritarianism and nationalism and with almost 200 million Muslims (15 per cent of the population), we must watch events in Europe closely, and ensure that our secular fabric remains intact. The implications directly impact the integrity of the nation. For Europe and India there is much to learn from each other.
Visions of Islam Will Shape Europe in the 21st Century’; The Atlantic; https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/05/akbar-ahmed-islam-europe/559391/
[ii] Xenophobia: Biggest threat to Europe’s future by ŞEYMA NAZLI GÜRBÜZ, DEC 06, 2019, Daily
Sabah, Link – https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/2019/12/06/xenophobia-poses-greatest-threat-to-europes-future
[iii] The Elephant in the Room: Islam and the Crisis of
Liberal Values in Europe, by
Alexander Betts,Foreign Affairs, 02 Feb 2016
[iv] Political Islam After the Arab Spring: Between
Jihad and Democracy, BY Oliver Roy, Nov/Dec 2017; Link- https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/review-essay/2017-10-16/political-islam-after-arab-spring
[v] ‘There’s a social
pandemic poisoning Europe: hatred of Muslims’ by Patricja Sasnal and Yasemin El Menouar, 28 Sep 20, The Guardian,
[vi] ‘Understanding Anti-Muslim Hate Crimes: A
Practical Guide’, OSCE Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights
(ODHIR), 2020, Link- https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/9/0/448696.pdf